As sharing learning objects is the raison d’ĂȘtre of SLOHSIG, it would be worth exploring what ‘sharing’ means, and how it might be implemented. The rationale for sharing is clear:
- on the supply side, there are uncountable zillions of e-learning resources that have been developed by universities, the NHS, colleges and other institutions, and by individuals, which the creators are happy to share with the healthcare community. And that’s just within the UK.
- on the demand side, teachers, students and healthcare workers want and need to access free-to-use high-quality (in terms of content as well as technical quality) online learning resources, and to find them quickly and easily. A very clear theme to come out of the Sharing Learning Objects in Healthcare conference was that of a ‘one-stop shop’, a simple and searchable repository of usable resources [1]
Behind these two desires lie a mountain of logistical, political and above all technical challenges which this SIG will be addressing. Issues that need to be explored include, in no particular order:
- what is meant by “sharing”?
- what is it that we want to share?
- the role of digital repositories
- the role of metadata harvesters [2]
- dissemination of learning resources
- how to ‘harvest’ resources not in repositories
- collaboration and cooperation amongst existing sharing projects (eg Jorum, Intute, CIPEL, IRISS)
Note that I’ve been careful to use the term “resource” rather than ‘learning object’ as there’s no agreed definition of ‘learning object’ [3] and, more importantly, I don’t want to pre-empt discussion on the above by excluding larger e-learning resources.
So the questions I’m asking are:
- Are these issues which we need to address? Or are some red herrings? What other issues need to be looked at?
- How do colleagues think that these issues can be resolved, and sharing implemented in practice?
- What other questions need to be asked?
Discuss
References
[1] In the electronic poll taken in the final conference session, available on the conference site (Powerpoint, 342kb), the following questions were asked:
Question: How can we encourage them to share their resource?
Response: 59% voted for “One stop search”
Q: What would/should national sharing look like?
R: 56% voted for “One stop shop”
It was also very clear from the plenary discussion that this was a common wish.
[2] A famous ‘one-stop-shop’ based on harvesting is OAIster.
[3] The Learning Object FAQ on the SONET site links to some papers exploring possible definitions of the term.